Was this a good answer to an email? (US Politics)?



My aunt and mother always send me these republican emails. This time I responded with an answer they probably won’t like. This was my reply (short and sweet):

“Great message. I think the federal reserve bank owns both parties. Republican = Democrat.”

Please tell me what you think.
———————————————————————
This was the original e-mail:
“545 vs 300,000,000
EVERY CITIZEN NEEDS TO READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT WHAT THIS JOURNALIST HAS SCRIPTED IN THIS MESSAGE. READ IT AND THEN REALLY THINK ABOUT OUR CURRENT POLITICAL DEBACLE.

Charley Reese has been a journalist for 49 years.

545 PEOPLE
By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason.. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.
What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits.. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red ..

If the Army &Marines are in IRAQ , it’s because they want them in IRAQ

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!”

Posted on July 18th, 2010 in Politics | 3 Comments »

Do you have the feeling that Obama politics will be extraordinarily messy, muddy and foggy ? Why ?



I have this feeling because of the level of manipulation that has lead to Obama’s election, because of his outstanding political skills in the sense that he will do anything to survive politically but not necessarily doing what’s best for the country and for the people. He will be heavily influenced by groups of interest while denying it (as it was the case until now). He will continue to play with the media and using uncommon communication skills (his campaign manager Plouffe is emailing Obama’s supporters asking them for advice on how to maintain Obama’s image…The people will only see what the Obama administration will allow them to see and a unprecedent part will remain behind curtains… I could continue but I’ll let you talk.

Posted on July 15th, 2010 in Politics | 7 Comments »

An important question concerning the Haiti relief?



Seems like President Obama is making a mistake by letting Bush help with Haiti. Remember Katrina? Wouldn’t there be a law forbidding his help?

The USS Carl Vinson is down there providing aid. The article I have attached shows they are using its reactors to make drinking water for the people. I would think such water is pumped with radiation and free radicals; it will only poison and kill them. I am pretty sure Bush came up with an idea like that.

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/IT_Nuclear_platform_for_Haiti_assistance_1801101.html?jmid=19084&j=243340186&utm_source=JangoMail&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=WNN+Daily%3A+Germany%27s+waste+removal+decision+%28243340186%29&utm_content=klwd32%40mizzou.edu

Posted on July 7th, 2010 in Politics | 10 Comments »

at fight the smears, there is a link to “report smears” & forward email to “watchdog@barackobama.com”?



I know this is something that is pretty old and has been there since the campaign, but who runs this site? do those emails being forwarded create a conflict of interest now that barack obama is in the whitehouse and is not supposed to collect data on private citizens by law and by law cannot get rid of certain correspondence including email. this is why he had to take down the flag@whitehouse.gov thing. how is he still getting around this questionable practice and why are we letting him? also who actually *gets* those emails and do they work in the obama administration? are they being paid by *our* tax dollars? does anyone have this info?

Posted on July 6th, 2010 in Politics | 2 Comments »

Why is the Mc Cain campaign sending out deceitful emails about Hamas wanting Obama?



http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/18/mccain-camp-says-hamas-wants-obama/

Posted on June 27th, 2010 in Politics | 12 Comments »

How should Obama use the millions of people who signed up to help his campaign? ?



13 million - number of people on Obama’s campaign email list, twice as much as Moveon.org the largest online political organization.

3 million - number of people who donated to his campaign.

2 million - number of profiles created by supporters on MyBarackObama.com

1.2 million - number of volunteers who were recruited by Obama’s campaign.

4,500 - number of “house parties” - designed to organize and discuss political issues - held by Obama supporters in December.

5,000 - number of groups who responded to a call from Obama’s transition team for reports on the best way to tackle health care issues.

100,000 - number of people who voted on Change.gov for questions they would most like to see Obama answer.

What can Obama do to harness the power of this community for the good of the country?

Posted on June 23rd, 2010 in Politics | 5 Comments »

Does this sound like a Liberal Democrat?



Glibness and Superficial Charm

Manipulative and Conning
They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

Grandiose Sense of Self
Feels entitled to certain things as “their right.”

Pathological Lying
Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.

Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
A deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core. Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.

Shallow Emotions
When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.

Incapacity for Love

Need for Stimulation
Living on the edge. Verbal outbursts and physical punishments are normal. Promiscuity and gambling are common.

Callousness/Lack of Empathy
Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others’ feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.

Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature
Rage and abuse, alternating with small expressions of love and approval produce an addictive cycle for abuser and abused, as well as creating hopelessness in the victim. Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.

Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency
Usually has a history of behavioral and academic difficulties, yet “gets by” by conning others. Problems in making and keeping friends; aberrant behaviors such as cruelty to people or animals, stealing, etc.

Irresponsibility/Unreliability
Not concerned about wrecking others’ lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.

Promiscuous Sexual Behavior/Infidelity
Promiscuity, child sexual abuse, **** and sexual acting out of all sorts.

Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle
Tends to move around a lot or makes all encompassing promises for the future, poor work ethic but exploits others effectively.

Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility
Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution. Changes life story readily.

——————————————————————————–

Other Related Qualities:

Contemptuous of those who seek to understand them
Does not perceive that anything is wrong with them
Authoritarian
Secretive
Paranoid
Only rarely in difficulty with the law, but seeks out situations where their tyrannical behavior will be tolerated, condoned, or admired
Conventional appearance
Goal of enslavement of their victim(s)
Exercises despotic control over every aspect of the victim’s life
Has an emotional need to justify their crimes and therefore needs their victim’s affirmation (respect, gratitude and love)
Ultimate goal is the creation of a willing victim
Incapable of real human attachment to another
Unable to feel remorse or guilt
Extreme narcissism and grandiose
May state readily that their goal is to rule the world

Posted on June 4th, 2010 in Politics | 9 Comments »

Is it a little weird to have a President’s campaign arm write form emails to send to Congress and send schedul?



schedules of Congressmen office hours out and tell supporters who might not even care about an issue to support it to Congressmen?

Has this ever happened before?

Because I admit I didn’t watch Bush closely for too long, but if he did this, I missed it.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/25972.html
Pat, by the president?

Posted on May 13th, 2010 in Politics | 5 Comments »

Clinton loaned her campaign $5 million - The Clintons are less than honest.would you loan them $5.00?



Remember when they were begging for money for Bill’s Legal Defense Fund? NOW they have money…

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Clinton_loaned_her_campaign_5_million.html
Clinton loaned her campaign $5 million

Spokesman Howard Wolfson emails:

Late last month Senator Clinton loaned her campaign $5 million.The loan illustrates Sen. Clinton’s commitment to this effort and to ensuring that our campaign has the resources it needs to compete and win across this nation. We have had one of our best fundraising efforts ever on the web stoday and our Super Tuesday victories will only help in bringing more support for her candidacy.

As I reported earlier, she’s drawing on a pool of personal wealth estimated to be as much as $41 million, as well as a reported payout to Bill Clinton of $20 million from the Los Angeles billionaire manager Ron Burkle.

Posted on April 24th, 2010 in Politics | 18 Comments »

Airport Security question! What would you personally prefer?



Would you support racial profiling or would you go for behavioral profile point being should government target people based on certain ethnicity or monitor the behavior of individuals regardless of race/gender/age

Posted on April 20th, 2010 in Politics | 16 Comments »

« Previous Entries