schedules of Congressmen office hours out and tell supporters who might not even care about an issue to support it to Congressmen?

Has this ever happened before?

Because I admit I didn’t watch Bush closely for too long, but if he did this, I missed it.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/25972.html
Pat, by the president?

Remember when they were begging for money for Bill’s Legal Defense Fund? NOW they have money…

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Clinton_loaned_her_campaign_5_million.html
Clinton loaned her campaign $5 million

Spokesman Howard Wolfson emails:

Late last month Senator Clinton loaned her campaign $5 million.The loan illustrates Sen. Clinton’s commitment to this effort and to ensuring that our campaign has the resources it needs to compete and win across this nation. We have had one of our best fundraising efforts ever on the web stoday and our Super Tuesday victories will only help in bringing more support for her candidacy.

As I reported earlier, she’s drawing on a pool of personal wealth estimated to be as much as $41 million, as well as a reported payout to Bill Clinton of $20 million from the Los Angeles billionaire manager Ron Burkle.

Would you support racial profiling or would you go for behavioral profile point being should government target people based on certain ethnicity or monitor the behavior of individuals regardless of race/gender/age

My concern is Barack’s relationship with Bill Ayers is more than crossing paths and campaign funds emailed from Saudi Arabi and other easten countries. Are we getting all the facts?

….or when a son of a Democratic representative hacked into Sarah Palin’s private email account?

Do Democrats care about privacy issues when they are abused for the purposes of attacking Republicans?

Will this phenomena get significantly worse once government bureaucrats loyal to Obama & Pelosi are given complete access to private medical records of every citizens?

I think not. I have noticed that SOME people on here are either (1) well-meaning liberals who unknowingly support the socialist agenda (useful idiots), or (2) avowed socialists who deceitfully defend the socialist agenda and attack patriots like myself. I don’t know which category each individual lib falls into, and I don’t really care, but it is time to clear the air.
A review of facts supports the reality that Socialism is a very clear and present danger:

In the early 1900s, unrest in Europe brought thousands of socialists to America. Many held degrees in psychology, sociology and psychiatry (the behavioral sciences) and a number of them became university professors
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_in_the_us
The socialists’ first target was education, and they attacked with deceitful language. There were no badges or socialist labels; followers described themselves as “liberal,” “progressive,” and even “moderate.” Words were the weapon of choice in this new war. By changing the meanings of words, socialists concealed their true purpose.
America’s educational system began to decline with the introduction of Socialism. Lenin said: “Communism is socialism in a hurry.” Socialism, therefore, is Communism by gradualism rather than by revolution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenin

John Dewey, known as “the father of modern education,” was an avowed socialist and the coauthor of the “Humanist Manifesto.” The U.S. House Committee on Un-American Activities discovered that he belonged to 15 Marxist front organizations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dewey

Norman Thomas, a socialist and member of the American Civil Liberties Union, boldly told the world: “The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Thomas

Like so many frogs-in-the-pot, there are people in the USA who haven’t yet noticed the heat rising incrementally. Those of us who see the light, are not going to stand idly by and be boiled

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog

Socialism must be destroyed, once and for all.

Recently major news broke out about Climategate which came out on November 14th and the e-mails were made public on the 21st. Major news stations are reporting that this is used as a tool to force Obama to reconsider going to the conference. Its said that Borack first announced he will be attending Copenhagen on November 25th but an unsure why the large media outlets are calling it a smear campaign if the emails were released before Obama ever announced if he would be attending….

In his new book The Audacity to Win, Obama for America campaign manager David Plouffe recalls that Sen. John McCain’s selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate was a fundraising boon — for the Obama campaign.

“We had taken in millions of dollars in the three hours since Palin had started speaking,” Plouffe recalls. “We hadn’t even asked for most of it; we had sent out just a single unplanned fund-raising email highlighting her attacks on community organizers, but it was just starting to hit people’s in-boxes as I checked the numbers. So the big response from the last three hours meant people were merely venting via contribution.

“Her speech might have ginned up their base, but apparently it had sent ours into orbit ,” Plouffe continues. “The image that came into my mind was of people sitting home with a computer on their laps, watching the Palin speech, and getting angrier and angrier, contributing again and then again. ‘I hope she keeps this up,’ I thought. ‘Sarah Palin has now become our best fund-raiser.’

I just received this news on the progress of HR 1207 & S 604 from the Campaign for Liberty via email.

July 6, 2009

Dear Friend of Liberty,

Earlier today, the first shot in our battle to pass Audit the Fed through the U.S. Senate was fired on the Senate floor by Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina.

Senator DeMint, who has a well-deserved reputation for taking the battle to the other side in the Senate, once again proved why he is such a valuable ally in our fight to bring transparency and accountability to the Federal Reserve.

A little while ago, the Senate voted to pass HR 2918, the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act. This $3 billion bill contains, among many other things, provisions for GAO audits on certain agencies.

Seizing on a chance to take quick action to bring Audit the Fed up for a vote, and with the GAO provisions in mind, Senator DeMint attached the full text of S 604, the Senate version of Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed bill, to HR 2918 as Senate Amendment 1367 before it was considered for final passage.

However, Senate Democrats refused to even allow a vote on the amendment! That’s right. The internationalist, Fed-loving elite in the Senate used a parliamentary tactic to shut down DeMint’s amendment.

After Senator DeMint brought Audit the Fed to the floor, Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska raised a “point of order” to prevent a vote, claiming that the amendment violated Senate Rule 16 by “legislating” on an appropriations bill. The Senate president agreed, and the amendment was shot down.

Senator DeMint did not back down, though, and directly challenged Senate leadership by pointing out the other GAO audits contained in the bill. As Senator DeMint listed them off, the Senate president was forced to agree with Senator DeMint that each one he described, all of which would be left in for final passage, also violated Senate Rule 16.

Which tells us at least one thing: the problem wasn’t with “legislating” on the bill or violating Senate Rules (which is commonly done). Shooting down the amendment was about preventing a thorough audit of the Federal Reserve for the first time in its history!

Senate leadership is hoping this issue will just fade away so they can get on to what they deem to be more “important” business, like dictating what kind of healthcare plan you and I can carry or passing destructive Cap-and-Tax legislation.

But the American people deserve answers on what the Fed has done with trillions of our tax dollars and what they are committing us and future generations to as part of their secret deals with foreign central banks and governments.

The leadership decided today to turn their backs on transparency, but our fight is just beginning.

As Senator DeMint made clear on the floor, the Audit the Fed bill has wide bipartisan support. He rightly warned the Senate that even if they delay today, they WILL have to deal with the issue on the floor.

It is up to you and me to back up Senator DeMint’s words by making sure the momentum continues to build and the bill comes up for a final vote.

The rejection of the Audit amendment is just the first battle in our war. Now is the time to really put the pressure on the U.S. Senate to Audit the Fed!

Senator DeMint fired the opening salvo and showcased the hypocrisy of the Senate for allowing other GAO audits to be included in the bill while refusing to even allow a vote on Fed transparency.

Again, we’re just getting started. Senator DeMint will keep fighting to pass Audit the Fed on its own or as an amendment, and we need to continue putting pressure on our senators to do everything in their power to achieve a floor vote!

Click here to sign our online petition. And visit our Audit the Fed action page for contact information to call, write, and fax your senators and urge them to support S 604 and to push for a final vote.

Together, we will finish this fight to Audit the Fed!

In Liberty,

John Tate

President

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_yjImzwuIU&eurl=http://www.campaignforliberty.com/index.php

The new bailout was in an email Campaign for Liberty send members. They (we) are gearing up to fight it and to mobilize nationally against those who voted for the bailout.

What do you think?

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/index.php
35 minutes and this question still hasn’t posted? Weird.
freakboy - true, but the answer isn’t for US to buy the imaginary assets.